Dive Bar Casanova

Traveler Harvester
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2025
Threads
5
Messages
216
Reaction score
241
Location
So Cali
Vehicles
EV6
Chevy Tahoe tows 7900 lbs - Harvester needs at least 7.000.
 

TwoJacks

Traveler EV
Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
74
Reaction score
70
Location
VT
Vehicles
Defender
AFAIK, 5,000 lbs. is the limit without a WDH.
IOW, a WDH is required for more than 5,000 lbs "conventional" towing regardless of the total tow rating (even HD pickups that are rated to tow upwards of 18k lbs.)
So I wouldn't assume that having a WDH will increase the tow rating.
Except for unibody vehicles like my Defender which can tow over 8,000 lbs but is not supposed to ever use a wdh per guidance from Land Rover.
 

JesseS

Traveler Harvester
Well-Known Member
First Name
Jesse
Joined
Oct 24, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
161
Reaction score
236
Location
California
Vehicles
'21 Ford Ranger XLT, Jayco RV (Ford F53)
Diesel is just under $6 a gallon here too.
Elections have consequences.
Yep, diesel used to be cheeper than gas, until all of the diesel cars & pickups came out and the oil companies decided they could make more money by jacking up the price.
 

jesemd

Traveler Harvester
Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
8
Reaction score
24
Location
PA
Vehicles
Forester
Yep, diesel used to be cheeper than gas, until all of the diesel cars & pickups came out and the oil companies decided they could make more money by jacking up the price.
Diesel has increased less than inflation over the last 10 years, and much of the increased cost is due to the mandate for Ultra Low Sulfur formulations.
 

Rouse

Terra Harvester
Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
12
Reaction score
12
Location
Des Moines, IA
Vehicles
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Price is the question, the difference in battery cost (both material and size) should more than make up for the 4 cylinder generator. If they price the Harvester similar to the BEV models with the same features and options, that will be a really hard sell. If the Harvester is priced something like $5,000 below a comparable BEV trim that will be compelling for a lot of people.

I also agree with others, I so wish the Harvester had a generator that took the place of the frunk. It seems like that would improve some of the towing capacity issues and be better packaging.
 

TwoJacks

Traveler EV
Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
74
Reaction score
70
Location
VT
Vehicles
Defender
If anything the harvester is going to cost more. No way it’s going to be cheaper than the BEV.
 

lunterhow

Terra Harvester
New Member
First Name
Hunter
Joined
Mar 1, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
Location
Austin,TX
Vehicles
lightning
I also agree with others, I so wish the Harvester had a generator that took the place of the frunk. It seems like that would improve some of the towing capacity issues and be better packaging.
Losing the frunk would be a deal breaker for me, it’s one of my most valued features in my Ford Lightning
 

NukeDukem

Traveler EV
Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2024
Threads
12
Messages
226
Reaction score
257
Location
Canada
Vehicles
Hyundai Ioniq 5, Tesla Model 3
The towing numbers for the Harvester models is a real disappointment and if those are the actual numbers I will be cancelling my reservation. A full size truck that can only town 5,000 LBS is useless
I’m sure it’s not useless to everyone. Wonder how many need to tow with the Terra?
 

E90400K

Traveler EV
Member
First Name
Francis
Joined
Mar 16, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Location
Toledo
Vehicles
E90 & Mach E
Price is the question, the difference in battery cost (both material and size) should more than make up for the 4 cylinder generator. If they price the Harvester similar to the BEV models with the same features and options, that will be a really hard sell. If the Harvester is priced something like $5,000 below a comparable BEV trim that will be compelling for a lot of people.

I also agree with others, I so wish the Harvester had a generator that took the place of the frunk. It seems like that would improve some of the towing capacity issues and be better packaging.
Agree.

After watching the video, I came away unimpressed with the Scout CEO. I don't know what his creds are, but his talking points made it clear to me the Harvester generator option is an afterthought from an EV engineering perspective. I think two years ago when the Scout resurrection materialized, the company had no intention of making a serial hybrid version and both Scouts were going to be BEV only.

Placing an ICE generator between the rear axle and rear bumper is a poor engineering choice, dictated by the imagined need to keep a large frunk. I think the reduction in towing weight with the Harvester is directly related to a lower tongue weight rating due to the added weight of the generator sitting at the rear of the chassis. As you've stated, placing the ICE generator in the front would recover the 10,000-pound towing capacity and IMO allow for a stronger ICE generator. From what I've seen of the currently released information about the Harvester, it is undersized because it is constrained by its rear-chassis location.
 

Hedrock

Traveler Harvester
Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jan 14, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
54
Reaction score
119
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Vehicles
2022 Ford Bronco Black Diamond
Price is the question, the difference in battery cost (both material and size) should more than make up for the 4 cylinder generator. If they price the Harvester similar to the BEV models with the same features and options, that will be a really hard sell. If the Harvester is priced something like $5,000 below a comparable BEV trim that will be compelling for a lot of people.

I also agree with others, I so wish the Harvester had a generator that took the place of the frunk. It seems like that would improve some of the towing capacity issues and be better packaging.
Yeah, I’d trade the frunk for towing capacity. Realistically, towing is an edge case for me, but “I want a frunk!” doesn’t seem like a primary buying motivator. I wonder if engineering is too set in stone at this point to change?
 

Dive Bar Casanova

Traveler Harvester
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2025
Threads
5
Messages
216
Reaction score
241
Location
So Cali
Vehicles
EV6
As long as it looks good I'm good to go .
I'll take style and color over practicality, sensible abilities and reason every time.

My opinion is useless. Hold that thought.
 

E90400K

Traveler EV
Member
First Name
Francis
Joined
Mar 16, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Location
Toledo
Vehicles
E90 & Mach E
Yeah, I’d trade the frunk for towing capacity. Realistically, towing is an edge case for me, but “I want a frunk!” doesn’t seem like a primary buying motivator. I wonder if engineering is too set in stone at this point to change?
I think they just started on the engineering solution for the Harvester option and probably could change the design at his stage. It's an easy out IMO, CEO Scott can just say, "Our customers wanted a higher tow rating near or at the BEV version level, so best engineering practice necessitated moving the generator to the frunk area." The only way a 250 HP in-line 4-cylinder would fit underneath the bed of the pickup is to have it be a dry-sump engine, or lay it flat, or possibly use the flat four cylinder from Porsche.
 
Top