Efthreeoh
New Member
- First Name
- IKE
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2024
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 8
- Location
- Timbucktoo
- Vehicles
- Fordson
- Thread starter
- #1
S
Last edited:
While we would obviously need to wait for clarifications or independent test once the vehicle is released. I would imagine as long as you have gas for the generator the vehicle will be able to continue to drive. My PHEV has a buffer built in.. So Zero battery charge on the gauge is really 10%Thanks for that detail.
Question: Say theoretically you are out in the wilderness and manage to completely deplete both the batteries and the gas generator.
Could you fill up the engine with gas from a can, and just take off again? Or would the generator have to run a whole to first charge up the batteries a little?
TLDR: Check out the Audi RS Q e-tron Hybrid Dakar Race carThanks for that detail.
Question: Say theoretically you are out in the wilderness and manage to completely deplete both the batteries and the gas generator.
Could you fill up the engine with gas from a can, and just take off again? Or would the generator have to run a whole to first charge up the batteries a little?
Good discussion on EREV / Series Hybrid but realize that BMW was chasing additional CARB ZEV credits in CA with the i3. If your EREV had more EV range than gas range, then the Range Extender couldn't get kick in until there was 6-7% battery charge left (in order to qualify as a "BEVx" and gain extra CARB credits).This is a good discussion about the Harvester.
That'd be a difficult/impossible package to accomplish because the Harvester would need about the same size battery pack as the full-EV model, but also fit the gas range extender engine.I thought that the non-hybrid model would get approx 300 miles range on batteries and the Harvester option would just boost that range. Now it seems the hybrid model will have a substantially shorter EV range and then run on gas like any other ICE vehicle. I was naively assuming the hybrid model would have the same EV range and the Harvester option would just add another 200 miles to that range when you really need it.
What are the experts thinking? 75% of the normal size? Half? Too early to say>That'd be a difficult/impossible package to accomplish because the Harvester would need about the same size battery pack as the full-EV model, but also fit the gas range extender engine.
Dont worry about it at this point. We don't have many details and you can order something completely different from your reservation.I put a reservation down for the model with the Harvester. Now I'm a bit worried. I thought that the non-hybrid model would get approx 300 miles range on batteries and the Harvester option would just boost that range. Now it seems the hybrid model will have a substantially shorter EV range and then run on gas like any other ICE vehicle. I was naively assuming the hybrid model would have the same EV range and the Harvester option would just add another 200 miles to that range when you really need it.
Thanks for the reply. Most of my trips will be 150 miles there and back. I don’t put very many miles on a vehicle. Maybe 8000 per year. It’s too early I suppose to make any decisions now but it sounds like the battery-only option might be better for me.The Harvester hybrid has more total range at 500 miles than the BEV version at 350 miles between recharging events. The difference to you will be in the MPGe efficiency. MPGe is the EV equivalent of MPG for an ICE-powered only vehicle. The 500 mile range rating is based on a fully charged battery and a full take of gasoline (assuming the engine is not a diesel). So, it is just a matter of cost-per-mile you will spend to travel in the Scout depending on how you use the Scout. If most of your trips will be within the 150-mile range of the EV-only mode and you recharge at home, then your cost will be nearly as low as the battery-only version. Nearly as low because the engine will consume the fuel in the tank over time to (a) prevent stale fuel build up and (b) to keep the engine operating at peak efficiency (i.e. not letting it sit in a non-running state). If you frequently drive your Scout long distances and only refuel at a gas station (vs. recharging the battery) your cost will be higher because of the less efficient conversion of the energy stored in the gasoline by the engine combustion process.
I believe you’re wrong. Pretty sure it’s 43.5%.
Isn’t that like 1.21 Gigawatts! Great Scott!To be precise... 42.8571429%