Taghkanic

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
14
Reaction score
19
Location
Hudson Valley NY
Vehicles
AEV Brute Double Cab
Thanks for that detail.

Question: Say theoretically you are out in the wilderness and manage to completely deplete both the batteries and the gas generator.

Could you fill up the engine with gas from a can, and just take off again? Or would the generator have to run a whole to first charge up the batteries a little?
 

Ehninger1212

Active Member
First Name
Jake
Joined
Oct 25, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
30
Reaction score
45
Location
Houston, TX
Vehicles
Audi A3 E-Tron - 2005 Land Rover LR3 - T-Bucket - 1951 chevy 3100
Thanks for that detail.

Question: Say theoretically you are out in the wilderness and manage to completely deplete both the batteries and the gas generator.

Could you fill up the engine with gas from a can, and just take off again? Or would the generator have to run a whole to first charge up the batteries a little?
While we would obviously need to wait for clarifications or independent test once the vehicle is released. I would imagine as long as you have gas for the generator the vehicle will be able to continue to drive. My PHEV has a buffer built in.. So Zero battery charge on the gauge is really 10%
 

Goose

Active Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
28
Reaction score
30
Location
NC
Vehicles
Toyota Sequoia
Thanks for that detail.

Question: Say theoretically you are out in the wilderness and manage to completely deplete both the batteries and the gas generator.

Could you fill up the engine with gas from a can, and just take off again? Or would the generator have to run a whole to first charge up the batteries a little?
TLDR: Check out the Audi RS Q e-tron Hybrid Dakar Race car
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a39851967/audi-rs-q-e-tron-hybrid-race-car-first-drive/

We don't yet know and it depends. What you're asking boils down to the law of thermodynamics. If Scout puts a beefy ICE motor then what you're asking about is perfectly reasonable as long as the battery was not at a dead 0%. If the motor is undersized then performance will be limited until the battery can be charged up enough.

Here's an example. The upcoming Ramcharger is using the 3.6 pentastar for multiple reasons, for this we will ignore the availability and reliability of the engine. The 3.6L has enough power to move the truck at normal speeds if it was connected straight to the wheels. While the truck would not have its normal 663HP capabilities, it would be able to charge the battery while you continue to make progress.

In the end it all comes down to Kilowatts. If you want a 1:1 power comparison, they will need to put in probably a turbo 6 cylinder at the very least in order to get the power required to never have a dip in performance.

Here is the most likely scenario based on cost and size. They will probably put a 4 cylinder engine in these trucks, then the engine will kick on when the battery dips to a certain percentage to charge it up. If the electric motor is not working hard, say on the highway when driving at a constant rate, then the little 4 banger will be able to outperform the electric demands. If you're pushing it REALLY hard then you will need to charge up first, then slow down.
 

JesseS

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jesse
Joined
Oct 24, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
62
Reaction score
46
Location
California
Vehicles
'21 Ford Ranger XLT, Jayco RV (Ford F53)
With a four banger in this case and you run the battery down to safety shutoff then I would think you would have to gas up and let the generator run for awhile to get back on the move, how long would depend on several things, generator output, battery charge rate, and DOC needed to resume
Traveling. I wouldn’t think the generator would be more than a 4-6 KWh.
 

Stumpy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Oct 25, 2024
Threads
12
Messages
68
Reaction score
104
Location
Boston
Vehicles
Jeep Grand Cherokee
This is a good discussion about the Harvester.

Good discussion on EREV / Series Hybrid but realize that BMW was chasing additional CARB ZEV credits in CA with the i3. If your EREV had more EV range than gas range, then the Range Extender couldn't get kick in until there was 6-7% battery charge left (in order to qualify as a "BEVx" and gain extra CARB credits).
 

4sallypat

Well-Known Member
First Name
Pat
Joined
Oct 27, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
45
Reaction score
41
Location
Southern California
Vehicles
'23 MME delivered May '23 + '22 Lightning July '22
Honda Clarity PHEV is also a parallel hybrid w/ eCVT.

2018 with 70K miles has been solid - no issues - very little cost to own.

Small 7 gallon gas tank will extend range from 45 miles pure EV to 350 miles of hybrid driving.

2 factory extended warranty / recalls: A/C evap and low pressure fuel pump.
 

NukeDukem

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2024
Threads
3
Messages
52
Reaction score
37
Location
Canada
Vehicles
Ford Escape, Tesla Model 3
I put a reservation down for the model with the Harvester. Now I'm a bit worried. I thought that the non-hybrid model would get approx 300 miles range on batteries and the Harvester option would just boost that range. Now it seems the hybrid model will have a substantially shorter EV range and then run on gas like any other ICE vehicle. I was naively assuming the hybrid model would have the same EV range and the Harvester option would just add another 200 miles to that range when you really need it.
 

NYR

Active Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Mar 22, 2023
Threads
8
Messages
30
Reaction score
55
Location
NYC
Vehicles
Jeep
I thought that the non-hybrid model would get approx 300 miles range on batteries and the Harvester option would just boost that range. Now it seems the hybrid model will have a substantially shorter EV range and then run on gas like any other ICE vehicle. I was naively assuming the hybrid model would have the same EV range and the Harvester option would just add another 200 miles to that range when you really need it.
That'd be a difficult/impossible package to accomplish because the Harvester would need about the same size battery pack as the full-EV model, but also fit the gas range extender engine.
 

NukeDukem

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2024
Threads
3
Messages
52
Reaction score
37
Location
Canada
Vehicles
Ford Escape, Tesla Model 3
That'd be a difficult/impossible package to accomplish because the Harvester would need about the same size battery pack as the full-EV model, but also fit the gas range extender engine.
What are the experts thinking? 75% of the normal size? Half? Too early to say>
 

GarageMahal

Member
First Name
JT
Joined
Nov 15, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
17
Reaction score
21
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
2023 F-150 Lightning; 2003 Mercury Marauder
I put a reservation down for the model with the Harvester. Now I'm a bit worried. I thought that the non-hybrid model would get approx 300 miles range on batteries and the Harvester option would just boost that range. Now it seems the hybrid model will have a substantially shorter EV range and then run on gas like any other ICE vehicle. I was naively assuming the hybrid model would have the same EV range and the Harvester option would just add another 200 miles to that range when you really need it.
Dont worry about it at this point. We don't have many details and you can order something completely different from your reservation.
 

NukeDukem

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2024
Threads
3
Messages
52
Reaction score
37
Location
Canada
Vehicles
Ford Escape, Tesla Model 3
The Harvester hybrid has more total range at 500 miles than the BEV version at 350 miles between recharging events. The difference to you will be in the MPGe efficiency. MPGe is the EV equivalent of MPG for an ICE-powered only vehicle. The 500 mile range rating is based on a fully charged battery and a full take of gasoline (assuming the engine is not a diesel). So, it is just a matter of cost-per-mile you will spend to travel in the Scout depending on how you use the Scout. If most of your trips will be within the 150-mile range of the EV-only mode and you recharge at home, then your cost will be nearly as low as the battery-only version. Nearly as low because the engine will consume the fuel in the tank over time to (a) prevent stale fuel build up and (b) to keep the engine operating at peak efficiency (i.e. not letting it sit in a non-running state). If you frequently drive your Scout long distances and only refuel at a gas station (vs. recharging the battery) your cost will be higher because of the less efficient conversion of the energy stored in the gasoline by the engine combustion process.
Thanks for the reply. Most of my trips will be 150 miles there and back. I don’t put very many miles on a vehicle. Maybe 8000 per year. It’s too early I suppose to make any decisions now but it sounds like the battery-only option might be better for me.
 
 
Top