Explained: EREV, Hybrid (Series vs. Parallel), PHEV in the Scout

[Efthreeoh]

What are the experts thinking? 75% of the normal size? Half? Too early to say>

43%

 

[NukeDukem]

The Harvester hybrid has more total range at 500 miles than the BEV version at 350 miles between recharging events. The difference to you will be in the MPGe efficiency. MPGe is the EV equivalent of MPG for an ICE-powered only vehicle. The 500 mile range rating is based on a fully charged battery and a full take of gasoline (assuming the engine is not a diesel). So, it is just a matter of cost-per-mile you will spend to travel in the Scout depending on how you use the Scout. If most of your trips will be within the 150-mile range of the EV-only mode and you recharge at home, then your cost will be nearly as low as the battery-only version. Nearly as low because the engine will consume the fuel in the tank over time to (a) prevent stale fuel build up and (b) to keep the engine operating at peak efficiency (i.e. not letting it sit in a non-running state). If you frequently drive your Scout long distances and only refuel at a gas station (vs. recharging the battery) your cost will be higher because of the less efficient conversion of the energy stored in the gasoline by the engine combustion process.

Thanks for the reply. Most of my trips will be 150 miles there and back. I don’t put very many miles on a vehicle. Maybe 8000 per year. It’s too early I suppose to make any decisions now but it sounds like the battery-only option might be better for me.

 

[NukeDukem]

43%

I believe you’re wrong. Pretty sure it’s 43.5%.

 

[Efthreeoh]

I believe you’re wrong. Pretty sure it’s 43.5%.

To be precise... 42.8571429%

 

[bilash31]

To be precise... 42.8571429%

Isn’t that like 1.21 Gigawatts! Great Scott!