Bronco Raptor comes with 37s as the only option for tires sizes. F-150 Raptor comes with 35s standard with the option of upgrading to a 37 package.35" wheels I think are now factory on some Jeep and Ford trims (and I would be extreamly surprised if Chevy and Dodge don't have any). My 2017 Ford was OEM 35".. I could easily be wrong, but I don't know of any consumer vehicles that come with anything larger OEM. I think there may be plenty of commercial vehicles that might.
It would make some sense for Scout to at least include them as an option, they are very common.
If what you were told is true that would mean both battery packs are the same, yet their 0-60 time is one second off so they’re not.As I said in my original post, I have seen it described both ways, but the Scout rep I spoke to at the Denver showing was clear that the battery was good for 350 miles and the Harvester would be able to charge the battery to allow another 150 miles.
this makes sense to me as my buddy with a rivian says his range is just shy of 400 miles. I can’t see why a designer would make an EV with only a 150 range on main battery.
Looking at the Scout website it says the Harvester will have a 60kWh battery and the Electric model will have a 120kWh battery, so this makes sense.I believe it has been confirmed that it is the other way around... 150 miles on battery and 350 miles of extended range from the ICE. It's just wishful thinking otherwise...
Where does it say that on the Scout Motors website? Based on current EV's, there's no way in hell either of these Scout bricks are going to get 350 miles of range (with 33's or 35's) with a 120kWh battery. Rivian has a 140kWh battery in the max pack, with the 34" A/T tires the range is reduced to 370 miles. I know the Scouts are concept vehicles, and designs can change, but the R1T and R1S are both slimmer and more streamlined than Scout concepts.Looking at the Scout website it says the Harvester will have a 60kWh battery and the Electric model will have a 120kWh battery, so this makes sense.
I found this on the website under Charging and EnergyWhere does it say that on the Scout Motors website? Based on current EV's, there's no way in hell either of these Scout bricks are going to get 350 miles of range (with 33's or 35's) with a 120kWh battery. Rivian has a 140kWh battery in the max pack, with the 34" A/T tires the range is reduced to 370 miles. I know the Scouts are concept vehicles, and designs can change, but the R1T and R1S are both slimmer and more streamlined than Scout concepts.
Plus, that 120kWh battery is going to be complete ass for those of us that want to tow anything. I have no interest in the EREV, I know it fills a niche, but I'm not interested in the added complexity.
If Rivian releases a R1T with coil spring suspension and the max pack I'm going to jump ship from Scout. Scout NEEDS to release more details.
*edit* - I found the information you referenced. Man, the Scout Motors website needs to be cleaned up too, this was buried. 120-130kWh still isn't enough energy for what these vehicles will be used for. EV's hardly ever hit their EPA estimated range unless you're on the highway and don't exceed 55mph.I found this on the website under Charging and Energy
While final specifications for the production models have not been released, we expect the capacity of the battery packs to be in the ranges below:
Full-electric models: 120-130 kWh
Harvester range extender models: 60-70 kWh
We’ll be sharing more details about battery sizes as we get closer to production. Stay tuned for updates.
My guess is that the 350 mile maximum BEV range is for city only driving, which is typically the most efficient driving for EVs due to brake regeneration and no engine idling at stops. It will definitely depend on the environment, driving habits, and resisting the heavy foot in any case.*edit* - I found the information you referenced. Man, the Scout Motors website needs to be cleaned up too, this was buried. 120-130kWh still isn't enough energy for what these vehicles will be used for. EV's hardly ever hit their EPA estimated range unless you're on the highway and don't exceed 55mph.
![]()
The EPA cycle is a mix of city and "highway" driving, however, as far as I know, highway speeds are limited to 55mph.My guess is that the 350 mile maximum BEV range is for city only driving, which is typically the most efficient driving for EVs due to brake regeneration and no engine idling at stops. It will definitely depend on the environment, driving habits, and resisting the heavy foot in any case.
yep - the rep had it backwards..."also verified that the battery only mileage is 350, with another 150 provided by the Harvester engine charging the battery”
You sure about this? It would be great if true but it sounds like the rep is misinterpreting the specs.