Adapting to the Future Tech Before Production

[robd2268]

The reveal was fantastic, and the CES videos really make the Scout a step above its competition.... right now. I am assuming tech will advance by the 2027 production, ie. battery tech (longer range), software tech, etc....

Will Scout adapt and change production model to accommodate the advancing tech that will come over the next 2 years?

I'd hate to get into a Scout only to see manufacturers announcing more advanced tech making the Scout tech old and sluggish.

 

[KarlT]

Is there you’re thinking of other than battery type? And required equipment to use batteries?

 

[robd2268]

Is there you’re thinking of other than battery type? And required equipment to use batteries?

I am not sure about specifics, I just know technology advances quickly and what is state of the art today will be old tech by 2027. It was just a thought and hoping that they are not "locked" into what is offered today and are planning on technology advancing and being flexible to changes in order to ensure the Scout is as current as can be when production starts.

 

[ScoutMagnatta]

I mean that goes with just about any kind of technology. Computers in general have a shelf life of 5 years or so before they are sluggish. While Moore's Law isn't really prevalent as much but I assume that technology will advance a little in the next two years. The key is how can Scout keep up with it without Future proofing and driving up costs.

 

[No_Remorse]

Interesting thought, however Scout has yet to provide any details tech-wise in terms of battery, components, etc., and who knows who's going to manufacture those things for them.

Know that tech is constantly changing and you can expect some form of "old" components after production begins. Hard to constantly be on the bleeding edge.

 

[4x4fun]

Scout can we please get a normal engine option? Not everyone wants an ev.

 

[J35t3r]

I am sure Scout Motors is aware of the rapid pace of technological advancement in the EV sector and is taking a proactive, multi-faceted approach to ensure their vehicles remain cutting-edge when they hit the market in 2027/2028.

They are embracing agile development and flexible production processes, enabling them to integrate new technologies and respond to market trends throughout the vehicle's development. This means they can incorporate advancements in battery tech, software, and other components closer to production, ensuring the final product is as up-to-date as possible.

Furthermore, Scout Motors is fostering partnerships with technology providers. This collaborative approach gives them access to the latest advancements and expertise, allowing them to stay ahead of the curve.

A key element of their strategy is a strong focus on software. By emphasizing software-defined features and over-the-air updates, Scout Motors can continuously improve vehicle performance and add new functionalities even after the vehicle is in the hands of the customer. This ensures their vehicles don't become obsolete quickly and remain competitive in the long run.

I am pretty sure Scout Motors understands that staying ahead in the EV game requires constant adaptation and a willingness to embrace new technologies. Their strategy, combining agility, collaboration, and a software-first approach, serves them well to navigate the challenges and capitalize on the opportunities presented by the evolving technological landscape.

 

[ScoutMagnatta]

Scout can we please get a normal engine option? Not everyone wants an ev.

I can almost guarantee that they won't ever be making an ICE vehicle

 

[4x4fun]

I can almost guarantee that they won't ever be making an ICE vehicle

Thats bad especially when bronco will eventually be offering both. Why wouldn't you want to cover the entire market?

 

[timmyhil]

Thats bad especially when bronco will eventually be offering both. Why wouldn't you want to cover the entire market?

NO, the less competition the better thats why. Same reason why Scout has the Harvester, because is a place in the market thats not their that need to be filled.

 

[quikster]

Thats bad especially when bronco will eventually be offering both. Why wouldn't you want to cover the entire market?

ford started with ICE engines, it makes no sense to start a new company today to make ICE vehicles. They have the harvester which can mostly function as the same thing and the world is moving to EVs in one form or another (EV, hybrid, EREV, etc). By not having separate ICE engines they don't have to build any of the tooling, maintenance, testing, service, etc that it would require